STANDARD ONE-DAY
INTERNATIONAL MATCH PLAYING CONDITIONS
Part-6
APPENDIX 1A
Calculation sheet for use when a delay or
interruptions occur in the First Innings
Time
Net
playing time available at start of the match
|
420 minutes
|
(A)
|
Time
innings in progress
|
___________
|
(B)
|
Playing
time lost
|
___________
|
(C)
|
Extra
time available
|
___________
|
(D)
|
Time
made up from reduced interval
|
___________
|
(E)
|
Effective
playing time lost [C – (D + E)]
|
___________
|
(F)
|
Remaining
playing time available (A - F)
|
___________
|
(G)
|
G divided by
4.2 (to 2 decimal places)
|
___________
|
(H)
|
Max
overs per team [H/2] (round up
fractions)
|
___________
|
(I)
|
Maximum
overs per bowler [ I / 5 ]
|
___________
|
|
Duration of Powerplay Overs (initial, batting side) __________ + __________
|
||
Rescheduled Playing Hours
|
||
First
session to commence or recommence
|
___________
|
(J)
|
Length
of innings [I x 4.2] (round up
fractions)
|
___________
|
(K)
|
Rescheduled
first innings cessation time [ J +
(K – B) ]
|
___________
|
(L)
|
Length
of interval
|
___________
|
(M)
|
Second
innings commencement time [ L + M ]
|
___________
|
(N)
|
Rescheduled
second innings cessation time [ N
+ K ]
|
___________ *(O)
|
|
*
Ensure that the match is not finishing earlier than the original or rescheduled
cessation time by applying Clause 12.4.2 a) iv). If so, add at least one over
to each team and recalculate (I) to (O) above to prevent this from happening.
APPENDIX 1B
Calculation sheet to check whether an
interruption during the First Innings should terminate the innings
Proposed
re-start time
|
___________
|
(P)
|
Rescheduled
cut-off time allowing for full use
|
||
of any
extra time provision
|
___________
|
(Q)
|
Minutes
between P and Q
|
___________
|
(R)
|
Potential overs to be bowled [ R / 4.2 ] (round up fractions)
|
___________
|
(S)
|
Number
of complete overs faced to date in first innings
|
___________
|
(T)
|
If S is greater
than T then revert to Appendix 1A
If S is less
than or equal to T then the first innings is terminated and go to Appendix 2A
Calculation sheet for the start of the Second
Innings
Maximum
overs to be bowled:
|
||
(If
first innings was terminated, S from Appendix 1B)
|
___________
|
(A)
|
Scheduled length of innings: [ A x 4.2 ] (round up fractions)
|
___________
|
(B)
|
Start
time
|
___________
|
(C)
|
Scheduled
cessation time [ C + B ]
|
___________
|
(D)
|
Overs per
bowler and Fielding Restrictions
Maximum
overs per bowler [ A / 5 ]
___________ overs Duration of
Powerplay overs (initial, batting side) __________ + __________ + __________
APPENDIX 2B
Calculation
sheet for use when interruption occurs after the start of the Second Innings
Time
Time
at start of innings
|
___________
|
(A)
|
Time
at start of interruption
|
___________
|
(B)
|
Time
innings in progress
|
___________
|
(C)
|
Restart
time
|
___________
|
(D)
|
Length
of interruption [ D – B ]
|
___________
|
(E)
|
Additional
time available: (Any unused provision for ‘Extra
|
||
Time’ or for earlier than scheduled start of second
innings)
|
___________
|
(F)
|
Total
playing time lost [ E – F ]
|
___________
|
(G)
|
Overs
|
||
Maximum
overs at start of innings
|
___________
|
(H)
|
Overs
lost [ G / 4.2 ] (rounded down)
|
___________
|
(I)
|
Adjusted
maximum length of innings [ H – I ]
|
___________
|
(J)
|
Rescheduled
length of innings [ J x 4.2
rounded up ]
|
___________
|
(K)
|
Amended
cessation time of innings [ D + (K – C) ]
|
___________
|
(L)
|
Overs per bowler and Fielding Restrictions
|
||
Maximum
overs per bowler [ J / 5 ]
|
___________
|
overs
|
Duration of
Powerplay overs (initial, batting side) __________ + __________ + __________
APPENDIX 4
Restriction of the placement of fieldsmen
APPENDIX 5
Bonus Point System
1 bonus point for any team that achieves victory
with a run rate 1.25 times that of the opposition.
A team’s run
rate will be calculated by reference to the number of runs scored divided by
the number of overs/balls faced.
Where a side is
all out, the number of overs to be used is the maximum number of overs that
side was otherwise eligible to face.
Where
matches are shortened and targets revised through the Duckworth/Lewis/Stern
system, bonus run rates and bonus defensive targets are derived as a function
of the revised target score (less one run) and maximum overs.
Whenever a target, or revised target, is set,
the exact number of overs/balls within which the side batting second must
achieve this target in order to gain the bonus point should be announced. Once
these overs/balls have been bowled, if the target has not then been achieved
the bonus point cannot be gained by any subsequent event, eg a multiple scoring
shot, or extras.
a) Examples of criteria for
the award of bonus points
TEAM BATTING FIRST TEAM BATTING SECOND TEAM BOWLING SECOND
SCORE
|
RUN RATE
|
REQUIRED
|
BALLS TO
|
REQUIRED
|
TARGET
|
RUN RATE
|
WIN (OVERS)
|
RUN RATE
|
SCORE
|
||
300
|
6
|
7.5
|
40.0
|
4.8
|
240
|
275
|
5.5
|
6.875
|
40.0
|
4.4
|
220
|
250
|
5
|
6.25
|
40.0
|
4
|
200
|
225
|
4.5
|
5.625
|
40.1
|
3.6
|
180
|
200
|
4
|
5
|
40.1
|
3.2
|
160
|
175
|
3.5
|
4.375
|
40.1
|
2.8
|
140
|
150
|
3
|
3.75
|
40.1
|
2.4
|
120
|
125
|
2.5
|
3.125
|
40.1
|
2
|
100
|
100
|
2
|
2.5
|
40.2
|
1.6
|
80
|
75
|
1.5
|
1.875
|
40.3
|
1.2
|
60
|
Note: the ‘target
score’ shown in the last column is the maximum total that the team batting
second can make for the team batting first to qualify for the bonus point.
Decision Review System (DRS) - Playing
Conditions
1 GENERAL
1.1
The DRS includes:
• The process for the referral by the on-field
umpires of a decision to the third umpire and/or the consultation process
(between the on-field umpire(s) and the
third umpire) initiated by the on-field umpire(s) as set out in
paragraph 2 below and which have been collectively termed in these playing
conditions as an
“Umpire Review”; and
• The process initiated by the players for the
review of an on-field umpire’s decision (by means of a consultation between the
on-field umpire(s) and the third umpire) as set out in paragraph 3 below and
which has been termed in these playing conditions as the “Player Review”.
1.2
The Home Board will be required to ensure that
the television technology specifications set out in Appendix 7 are provided.
1.3 In particular, the Home Board is to ensure that
a separate room is provided for the third umpire and that he has access to the
television equipment and technology as specified in Appendix 7 so as to be in
the best position to facilitate the referral and/or consultation processes
referred to in paragraphs 2 (Umpire Review) and 3 (Player Review) below.
1.4 The ICC shall appoint an independent technology
expert (ICC Technical Official) to be present at every series to assist the
third umpire and to protect the integrity of the DRS process.
2 UMPIRE REVIEW
In the circumstances detailed in paragraphs 2.1,
2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 below, the on-field umpire has the discretion to refer
the decision to the third umpire or, in the case of 2.2.(a), 2.4 and 2.5, to
consult with the third umpire before making the decision and should take a
common sense approach.
Save for requesting the umpire to review his
decision under paragraph 3 (Player Review) below, players may not appeal to the
umpire to use the Umpire Review - breach of this provision would constitute
dissent and the player could be liable for discipline under the ICC Code of
Conduct.
The third umpire shall call for as many replays
from any camera angle as is necessary to reach a decision. As a guide, a
decision should be made within 30 seconds whenever possible, but the third
umpire shall have the discretion to take more time.
2.1 Run Out, Stumping and Hit
Wicket Decisions
a)
The on-field umpire shall be entitled to refer
an appeal for a run-out, stumping or hit wicket to the third umpire.
b)
An on-field umpire wishing to refer a decision
to the third umpire shall signal to the third umpire by making the shape of a
TV screen with his hands.
c) In the case of a referral of a hit wicket or
stumping decision, the third umpire shall first check the fairness of the
delivery (all modes of No ball except for the bowler using an illegal action,
[for clarity, a specific type of banned delivery can be reviewed and called no
ball]). If the delivery was not a fair delivery he shall indicate that the
batsman is not out and advise the on-field umpire to signal no ball. See also
paragraph 3.10 below.
d) Additionally, if the third umpire finds the
batsman is out by another mode of dismissal (excluding LBW), or not out by any
mode of dismissal (excluding LBW), he shall notify the on-field umpire so that
the correct decision is made.
e) If the third umpire decides the batsman is out a
red light is displayed; a green light means not-out. Should the third umpire be
temporarily unable to respond, a white light (where available) will remain
illuminated throughout the period of interruption to signify to the on-field
umpires that the TV replay system is temporarily unavailable, in which case the
decision will be taken by the on-field umpire. (As an alternative to the
red/green light system and where available, the big replay screen may be used
for the purpose of conveying the third umpire’s decision.)
2.2 Caught Decisions,
Obstructing the field
In the event of an appeal for a caught decision:
Fair Catches,
Bump Ball and Obstructing the Field
a) Should the bowler’s end umpire be unable to
decide whether or not a catch was taken fairly, or if a catch was taken from a
bump ball or not, or if, on appeal from the fielding side, the batsman
obstructed the field, he shall first consult with the square leg umpire.
b) Should both on-field umpires require assistance
from the third umpire to make a decision, the bowler’s end umpire shall firstly
take a decision on-field after consulting with the other umpire, then he shall
consult by two-way radio with the third umpire. Such consultation shall be
initiated by the bowler's end umpire to the third umpire by making the shape of
a TV screen with his hands, followed by an ‘out’ or ‘not out’ signal made with
the hands close to the chest at chest height. If the third umpire advises that
the replay evidence is inconclusive, the on-field decision communicated at the
start of the consultation process shall stand.
c) The third umpire has to determine whether the
batsman has been caught or if it was a bump ball or not, or if the batsman obstructed
the field.. However, in reviewing the television replay(s), the third umpire
shall first check the fairness of the delivery for decisions involving a catch
(all modes of No ball except for the bowler using an illegal action, [for
clarity, a specific type of banned delivery can be reviewed and called no
ball]) and whether the batsman has hit the ball. If the delivery was not a fair
delivery or if it is clear to the third umpire that the batsman did not hit the
ball he shall indicate to the on-field umpire that the batsman is not out
caught, and in the case of an unfair delivery, advise the on-field umpire to
signal no ball. See also paragraph 3.10 below. Additionally, if it is clear to
the third umpire that the batsman is out by another mode of dismissal
(excluding LBW), or not out by any mode of dismissal (excluding LBW), he shall
notify the on-field umpire so that the correct decision is made.
For clarity, the third umpire shall not check for another mode of
dismissal when there is an appeal for obstructing the field.
d)
The third umpire shall communicate his decision
by the system as in paragraph 2.1 (e).
2.3 Boundary Decisions
a) The on-field umpire shall be entitled to refer
to the third umpire for a decision about whether the fieldsman had any part of
his person in contact with the ball when he touched the boundary or when he had
any part of his person grounded beyond the boundary, or whether a four or six
had been scored. A decision is to be made immediately and cannot be changed
thereafter.
b) An on-field umpire wishing the assistance of the
third umpire in this circumstance shall communicate with the third umpire by
use of a two-way radio and the third umpire will convey his decision to the
on-field umpire by this method.
c) The third umpire may initiate contact with the
on-field umpire by two-way radio if TV coverage shows a boundary line
infringement or incident that appears not to have been acted upon by the
on-field umpires.
2. 4 Batsmen Running to the Same End
a) In the event of both batsmen running to the same
end and the umpires are uncertain over which batsmen made his ground first, the
on-field umpire may consult with the third umpire.
b)
The procedure in paragraph 2.3 (b) shall apply.
3 PLAYER REVIEW
The following clauses shall operate in addition to and in conjunction
with paragraph 2 (Umpire Review).
3.1 Circumstances in which a
Player Review may be requested
a) A player may request a review of any decision
taken by the on-field umpires concerning whether or not a batsman is dismissed,
with the exception of ‘Timed Out’ (Player Review).
b) For the avoidance of doubt, no other decisions
made by the umpires are eligible for a Player Review with the exception of Fair
Catch/Bump Ball (even after the 3rd umpire has been consulted and decision
communicated).
c) Only the batsman involved in a dismissal may
request a Player Review of an ‘Out’ decision and only the captain (or acting
captain) of the fielding team may request a Player Review of a ‘Not Out’
decision.
d) A decision concerning whether or not a batsman
is dismissed that could have been the subject of a Umpire Review under
paragraph 2 is eligible for a Player Review as soon as it is clear that the
on-field umpire has chosen not to initiate the Umpire Review.
3.2 The manner of requesting
the Player Review
a)
The request should be made by the player making
a ‘T’ sign with both forearms at head height.
b) The total time elapsed between the ball becoming
dead and the review request being made should be no more than 15 seconds. The
only exception permitted is when an Umpire Review of a fair catch or bump ball
(as permitted in Clause 2.2 above) is required to answer an appeal for a Caught
decision, in which case either team is able to request a Player Review of that
Caught decision within 15 seconds of the decision being communicated. The
on-field umpire should provide the player with a prompt after 10 seconds if the
request has not been made at that time and the player should request the review
immediately thereafter. If the umpires believe that a request has not been made
within the 15 second time frame, they will decline to review the decision.
c) The captain may consult with the bowler and
other fielders or the two batsmen may consult with each other prior to deciding
whether to request a Player Review. Under no circumstances is any player
permitted to query an umpire about any aspect of a decision before deciding on
whether or not to request a Player Review. If the umpires believe that the
captain or batsman has received direct or indirect input emanating other than
from the players on the field, then they may at their discretion decline the
request for a Player Review. In particular, signals from the dressing room must
not be given.
d) No replays, either at normal speed or slow
motion, should be shown on a big screen to spectators until the time allowed
for the requesting of a Player Review has elapsed. The only exception to this
provision is when the Player Review of a Caught decision is requested after the
Umpire Review of a fair catch or bump ball has concluded, as detailed in 3.2(b)
above, as replays may have been shown on the big screen during that Umpire
Review process. See also paragraph 3.11 below.
e)If either on-field umpire initiates an Umpire
Review under paragraph 2, this does not preclude a player seeking a Player
Review of a separate incident from the same delivery. The Player Review request
may be made after the Umpire Review provided it is still within the timescale
described in (b) above. (See 3.8 (b) and 3.8 (c) below for the process for
addressing both an Umpire and Player Review).
f)
A request for a Player Review may not be
withdrawn once it has been made.
3.3 The process of consultation
a)
On receipt of an eligible and timely request for
a Player Review, the on-field umpire will make the sign of a television with
his hands in the normal way.
b)
He will initiate communication with the third
umpire by confirming the decision that has been made and that the player has
requested a Player Review.
c)
The third umpire must then work alone,
independent of outside help or comment, other than when consulting the on-field
umpire.
d) A two-way consultation process should begin to investigate
whether there is anything that the third umpire can see or hear which would
indicate that the on-field umpire should change his decision.
e) This consultation should be on points of fact,
where possible phrased in a manner leading to yes or no answers. Questions
requiring a single answer based on a series of judgements, such as “do you
think that was LBW?” are to be avoided.
f) The third umpire shall not withhold any factual
information which may help in the decision making process, even if the information
is not directly prompted by the on-field umpire’s questions. In particular, in
reviewing a dismissal, if the third umpire believes that the batsman may
instead be out by any other mode of dismissal, he shall advise the on-field
umpire accordingly. The process of consultation described in this paragraph in
respect of such other mode of dismissal shall then be conducted as if the
batsman has been given not out.
g) The third umpire should initially check whether
the delivery is fair (all modes of No ball except for the bowler using an
illegal action, [for clarity, a specific type of banned delivery can be
reviewed and called no ball]) where appropriate advising the on-field umpire
accordingly. See also paragraph 3.10 below.
h) If despite the available technology, the third
umpire is unable to answer with a high degree of confidence a particular
question posed by the on-field umpire, then he should report that the replays
are ‘inconclusive’. The third umpire should not give answers conveying
likelihoods or probabilities.
i)
Subject to paragraph 3.3 (j) below, specifically
when advising on LBW decisions, the requirement for a high degree of confidence
should be interpreted as follows:
i) With regard to determining the point of pitching
the evidence provided by technology should be regarded as definitive and the
Laws as interpreted in clause 3.9 (a) below should be strictly applied.
ii)
With regard to the point of impact
• If a ‘not out’ decision is being reviewed, in order to report that the
point of impact is between wicket and wicket (i.e. in line with the stumps),
the
evidence provided by technology should show that
the centre of the ball at the moment of interception is in line within an area
demarcated by a line drawn down the outside of the outer stumps.
• If an ‘out’ decision is being reviewed, in order to report
that the point of impact is not between wicket and wicket (i.e. outside the
line of the stumps), the evidence provided by technology should show that no
part of the ball at the moment of interception is between wicket and wicket.
iii)
With regard to determining whether the ball was
likely to have hit the stumps:
• If a ‘not out’ decision is being reviewed, in order to report that the ball is hitting
the stumps, the evidence provided by technology should show that the centre of
the ball would have hit the stumps within an area demarcated by a line drawn
below the lower edge of the bails and down the outside of the outer stumps.
However, where the evidence shows that the ball would have hit the stumps
within the demarcated area as set out above but that:
• The point of impact is 300cm or more from the
stumps; or
• The point of impact is more than 250cm but less
than 300cm from the stumps and the distance between point of pitching and point
of impact is
less than 40cm,
the original decision will stand (i.e. not out).
• If an ‘out’ decision is being reviewed, in order to report that the ball is missing
the stumps, the evidence of the technology should show that no part of the ball
would have made contact with any part of the stumps or bails.
iv)
With regard to
determining whether the ball was likely to have hit the stumps after striking
the pad on the full and being predicted to pitch before striking or passing the
stumps:
• The technology should predict the line of the
delivery in accordance with Law 36.2b and show this path from directly above
the stumps in the simulation.
• The 3rd umpire shall advise the on-field umpire
whether the ball was going to intercept the line of the stumps based on the
prediction of the technology, and make no comment on the predicted height of
the ball after pitching, which shall remain a judgment of the on -field umpire.
j) In circumstances where the television technology
(all or parts thereof) is not available to the third umpire or fails for
whatever reason, the third umpire shall advise the on-field umpire of this fact
but still provide any relevant factual information that may be ascertained from
the available television replays and other technology. See also paragraph 3.5
(d).
k) The on-field umpire must then make his decision
based on those factual questions that were answered by the third umpire, any
other factual information offered by the third umpire and his recollection and
opinion of the original incident.
l) The on-field umpire will reverse his decision if
the nature of the supplementary information received from the third umpire
leads him to conclude that his original decision was incorrect.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment